Pending
Schaghticoke Land Claims
The
Schaghticoke Tribal Nation was deprived of much of its historical
lands through a series of illegal and involuntary transfers, primarily
carried out by a succession of "overseers" charged by
the Colony and State of Connecticut with protecting the Tribe and
its lands. In this century, the Tribe has attempted to preserve
the small land portion it still controls and to regain some of its
lost land base.
There
are three cases pending in the federal district court in Connecticut
involving the land claims of the Tribe. The first, United States
v. 43.47 Acres of Land, Civil No. H-85-1078 (PCD) (hereinafter Schaghticoke
I), is a condemnation proceeding that was initiated by the United
States for the benefit of the National Park Service in 1985 to acquire
43.47 acres of land in Connecticut for the Appalachian Trail. The
second case, Schaghticoke Tribal Nation v. Kent School Corporation
et al., Civil No.3-98-CV-01113 (hereinafter Schaghticoke II), is
a suit filed in 1998 pursuant to the federal Nonintercourse Act
claiming title to more than 1900 acres of land that were transferred
to third parties in violation of that act. The third case, Schaghticoke
Tribal Nation v. United States of America et al., Civil No. 300CV0820,
(hereinafter Schaghticoke III), is a suit filed in May 2000 pursuant
to the federal Nonintercourse Act claiming title to more than 148
acres of land that were transferred to third parties in violation
of that act.
The
1985 condemnation action filed in Schaghticoke I would take additional
land from the Tribe's meager Reservation, threaten the rattlesnake
den (one of the few remaining in Connecticut), and transfer to the
United States tracts to which the Tribe claims rightful title under
the Nonintercourse Act. After determining that the condemnation
could not proceed if the Tribe were acknowledged under federal law,
the court stayed the action pending the BIA's determination of that
tribal status - making this a central issue in the case.
For
many years the government pressed the court to summarily determine
Schaghticoke I, and resisted the Tribe's request for additional
time to complete the necessary research to support its petition
for recognition. Now that the Tribe has completed its research and
faces years of delays before the BIA will issue a final determination
on its petition, the United States resists the Nations request
that the court provide a judicial resolution of tribal status, a
resolution that will also resolve the pending condemnation claim
in Schaghticoke I.
The
Tribe's intensive research effort in support of its petition for
federal acknowledgment led to the 1998 filing of Schaghticoke II.
In this case, the Tribe asks the court to restore approximately
1900 acres of Reservation land improperly transferred in violation
of the 1790 Non-Intercourse Act. Governing precedent in Golden Hill
Paugussett means this case cannot be resolved without a final determination
of the Tribe's status - which the BIA may not complete (or
even begin) for many years.
The
Schaghticoke Tribal Nation asked the District Judge to consolidate
Schaghticoke I and II, and decide the central issue common to both
actions - the Tribe's federal status. The Schaghticoke Tribal
Nation seeks due process from the United States. If the agency cannot
act, then the court should. Moreover, the Department of the Interior
has a conflict of interest in Schaghticoke I since a negative ruling
on tribal status would produce victory in court for the United States
in its claim to condemn tribal lands. Schaghticoke III is an attempt
to have restored to the Tribe, land lying immediately south of the
current Reservation, which was illegally transferred to New Milford
Power Co. in connection with the construction and operation of the
Bulls Bridge Dam and power plant.
By order of September 11, 2000 the District Judge lifted the stay,
which prevented the cases from proceeding. It is hoped that the
Courts action in lifting the stay will accelerate action on the
Tribe's petition for federal recognition
|